ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Introduction: Robotic approach has shown its feasibility and safety with respect to open approach for radical cystectomy (1). The performances of Hugo™ RAS system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) have been demonstrated in several clinical scenarios (2-5). We report the feasibility and surgical settings of the first series of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal ileal-conduit performed with Hugo™ RAS system. Methods: Two patients were submitted to RARC with ileal conduit at our institution. The trocar placement scheme and the operating room setting with docking angles of the four arms were already described (6). A 12-mm and a 5-mm trocar for the assistant were placed. In both cases, an ileal-conduit with a Wallace type-1 uretero-enteric derivation was performed intra-corporeally. Results: The first patient was a 71-year-old male with a very-high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer(BC), and the second patient was a 64-year-old male with a diagnosis of T2 high-grade BC. Operative times were 360 and 420 minutes with a docking time of 12 and 9 minutes, respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred. The estimated blood loss was 200ml and 400ml, respectively. The second patient developed an ileus on postoperative day 4 (Clavien-Dindo grade 2). No positive surgical margins were recorded. No recurrence nor progression occurred during follow-up. Conclusion: RARC with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion is feasible with Hugo™ RAS system. We provided insight into the surgical setting using this novel robotic platform to help new adopters to face this challenging procedure. These findings may help a wider distribution of robotic programs for BC treatment.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Describe morbidity and survival in patients older than 80 years with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treated with radical cystectomy (RC) or transurethral resection (TUR) in our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our database of all patients older than 80 years treated with RC and TUR for MIBC between 1993 and 2005 in our institution. Twenty-seven patients were submitted to RC, with mean age of 82 years and mean follow-up of 16.4 months. RC was carried out following diagnosis of previous MIBC in 14 cases (51.9 percent). The American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score was III or IV in 23 patients (85.1 percent). Seventy-two patients with a mean age of 84 years and mean follow-up of 33 months, diagnosed with MIBC, were managed by means of TUR. The ASA score was III-IV in 64 (88.8 percent) patients. RESULTS: Pathological stage of the RC specimen was pT3 in 18 cases (66.7 percent). Mean hospital stay was 16 days. Early complications were assessed in 8 patients (29.6 percent), with an overall survival (OS) of 42.94 percent, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of 60.54 percent. In patients submitted to TUR, clinical stage was T2 in 36 cases (50 percent). The mean hospital stay was 7 days, with a readmission rate (RR) of 87.5 percent. OS and CSS was less than 20 percent. CONCLUSIONS: RC in octogenarian patients is a safe procedure, with complication and survival rates comparable to RC series in general population. Transurethral resection (TUR) for patients with MIBC within this age range is a much less morbid procedure, but disease specific survival is lower.